• Home
  • About Us
    • Quick Info
    • Customers
  • Philosophy
    • We do the Math
    • Product to Person
    • The Pareto Principle
  • Services
    • Automated Distribution Center
    • Material Handling Design
    • Pallet Shuttle Systems
    • ROI AGV Fork It
    • System Integration
    • Consulting and Studies
    • AGC
    • WCS
      • The Conductor
    • GOH Storage
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • Solutions
    • abco AUTOMATION’s Process
    • Analysis of Your DC
    • Concepting
    • Client Presentation
    • Design and Layout
    • ROI Analysis
    • Completed Concept
  • Downloads
  • Blog
  • Video

Surprising Cost Difference between Automated Distribution Centers & Conventional

by Travis Baker

Transcript for: Surprising Cost Difference between Automated Distribution Centers & Conventional

Hi, I’m Cory Flemings from abco automation. Hey I want talk to you today about a story about concrete or about conventional buildings versus automated distribution centers. In a recent event in my life we were working with a client that wanted to build a conventional freezer. We said no you should consider automation.  And she said OK, the CFO, we will consider automation, but it is really just a throwaway option.

I said, “Throwaway option? That’s not true!”

She said sure it is, “Automation is so expensive.”

That’s something that we in the automation field hear all the time.

I said well you are a CFO, pull out your calculator and let’s run some numbers. So she pulled out a calculator and we went to work.

I said the conventional facility for the operation that you want to do will be 500,000 ft.² and if you take 500,000 ft.² and multiply that by $120 a square foot what does that come out to?

She said that’s “$60 million”.  I said that’s correct.

I said I am looking at an automated distribution center or automated storage and retrieval facility that is 117,000 ft.². Yes, a hundred and 117,000 ft.², compared to 500,000 ft.² but I said tell you what let’s add on another hundred thousand square feet for docks, workspace and so forth and we will give you a building that is 220,000 ft.².And if you multiply that by $120 a square foot. What do you get?

And she said, “Oh gosh my calculator must be wrong.”  I said no, it’s not, wrong it is only $26.4 million.

She said, “That cannot be!”, I said yes that is true in the difference between these two is substantial.

But that’s not the end of this picture. If you have to go buy the land for this process then you have to spend even more money. A let me show you why.

When you build a building on a piece of property depending upon local codes and ordinances you cannot consume with your operation more than 50% of the land.  So if you take 25% of the land and then add to it your concrete turnarounds, your waste-water basins, your easements and your parking lots all of those other pieces of the property shouldn’t add up to more than 40%.  Because in the future you might want 10%, between 40 and 50% to build a new maintenance building or whatever. You don’t want to land lock yourself on day one.

So you only use 25% of the land you buy for your distribution center.  So if you want to put in a building that is 500,000 ft.² you need to actually buy 46 acres of property to support that operation. And if land is $100,000 an acre that is $4.6 million more.

Over here for 220,000 ft.² I need 20 acres to support that operation. And 20 acres again at $100,000 a square acre is another $2 million.

So look at the substantial difference now between when you build a green field building a conventional building versus an automated distribution center.

You are looking at a difference of $64.6 million here and over here $28.4 million and I have a $36.6 million difference between these two.  And that’s $36 million you can spend on automation to get a building that cost as much as a conventional building that is not racked, that doesn’t have rolling stock that doesn’t have a WMS, that doesn’t have an RF network with guns and so forth.

You are talking about a lot of automation and material handling equipment that you can invest in before you even turn the key and turn on it on, let alone the labor savings once it begins to run. So when people tell you automation is too expensive and you are going to build a green field distribution centers remember this tale of two distribution centers and how much difference this can make.

We have a white paper about this subject “Why You Should Go Up” I recommend you download it and it can be found here.

 

 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...
Filed Under: Return on Investment ROI, Space, video

abco automation Chosen to Design Material Handling Systems for National Retailer

by Travis Baker

Carlstadt, NJ, September, 2012 –A  national furniture, home décor, housewares & gifts retailer recently selected abco automation from a group of 3 final vendors to design an automated material handling upgrade for their distribution center.

abco automation won the project by demonstrating the best return-on-investment, and boosting throughput with an innovative design that applied automation to improve process flow while maximizing the cube of the building.

The integrated system is supplied by the following major component suppliers:  TGW mini-load cranes, Vocollect pick-to-voice, Dematic conveyor, and a private-label warehouse control system integrated by abco automation.

“We were selected because of our ability to thoroughly analyze their business and to mathematically quantify, in detail, the future facility requirements. This enabled us to engineer a solution that truly fit their needs,” said Jack Lehr President

Jack Lehr, President of abco automation

of abco automation. “The solution is a hybrid product-to-person order fulfillment system that is quickly scalable to handle the holiday peaks of this big box and e-commerce retailer, while dramatically increasing productivity in the order fulfillment process.”

Construction on the material handling system will begin in January 2013 and will be completed in June 1, 2013.

About abco automation

abco automation is an American firm that specializes in designing and implementing American-built, capital-efficient distribution systems. A straight-speaking, flexible, fun-to-work-with American company, abco automation designs and installs the very best product-to-person (P2Psm) picking systems at the most reasonable price.

abco automation specializes in identifying and applying the right technology for each speed products. We Do the Math. All of abco automation’s designs require examination of the customer’s solution through the proven lens of the Pareto Curve. abco automation designs capital-efficient systems that do more, in less space, with fewer people. Visit www.abcoAUTOMATION.us for more information.

Media Contact: Travis A. Baker, abco automation: marketing@abcoautomation.us.

 

 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...
Filed Under: News, Press Release, Return on Investment ROI, System integration

5 Reasons to Choose a System Integrator for Your DC Project

by Cory Flemings

So why should you use a system integrator instead of a manufacturer for your distribution center project?  After all, a manufacturer knows the product best and will be able to give you the best price too, right?

Well, not always.

The main reason a system integrator is the best partner for your distribution center is their ability to choose.  Integrators have flexibility to choose from different suppliers that will work best for you. This is opposed to a manufacturer trying to shoehorn a solution with one of the products they make.5 reasons to choose a System integrator for Your material handling

Let’s explore these advantages:

Efficiency:  Whether defined by cost or performance, system integrators can source the most efficient components for your application.  Not all of the technologies that would yield the most efficient solution can be sourced from the same manufacturer. But why can’t manufacturers just integrate different technologies?

Bias:    Even if some manufacturers say that they are free to use any competitor’s components, what are they more likely to push you towards?  One of theirs, right?  And who can blame them?  They know the technology better; they make more money, and lower their risk by pushing something they make vs. buying it from a competitor.  Which leads us to…

Competition:  Manufacturers are less inclined to use a competitor’s technology. Obviously manufacturers are not in the business of helping their competitors by integrating their technology solutions; they are in the business of selling their own. System integrators, on the other hand, are not constrained in their choice of vendors since they aren’t really competing with the manufactures; the manufacturers are their suppliers.

Cost:  Just because one manufacturer makes one component cheaper doesn’t mean that all their components are the best value.  If manufacturer A makes an inexpensive #1 and #2 component, but #3 is expensive, and manufacturer B makes an inexpensive #3 and #4 but everything else costly, doesn’t it make sense to mix and match and save money?  That’s where a system integrator help you can lower your aggregate system cost.

Experience:  A good system integrator has a variety of experience with different technologies.  Instead of being a manufacturer that has one set of solutions, a system integrator can have both the access to, and experience with a variety of technologies.

So what do you see as the best reasons to work with a distribution center system integrator vs. a manufacturer?  Let us know by commenting below.  And if you would like to talk to a system integrator about your distribution center project contact abco automation. 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...
Filed Under: Return on Investment ROI, Uncategorized

ROI from Your Automated Distribution Center

by Cory Flemings

Finding ROI in your automated Distribution centerWhen designing an automated distribution center the ROI of your design is one of the most important factors.  ROI is a function of three things: capital, labor and building space.

No matter how you cut it, all three are always in tension: you can have a low labor headcount and a small footprint, but you will have high capital costs. You can have a lower capital cost and a low building footprint, but you will have a higher headcount (two shifts instead of one). You can have a low capital cost, but you will trade with an increase in labor and footprint.

Let’s expand on the topic and look at your options when you focus on each individual component.

Conserve Capital:  Most traditional distribution centers in the US focus on this.   This is where you lease or build a 30 foot high DC.  There is usually a great deal of static racking and conveyor and very little automation.

Effect on Labor:  There will be high labor rates.  With little advanced technology you can’t perform product-to–person picking.  To generate more throughput you have to have more people.  Limited technology can be used, but it will along the lines of pick-to-voice.

Effect on Space:  When you conserve capital and don’t spend on more advanced technology you typically end up with a low building with a big footprint.  This usually means you are further away from a desirable transportation trunk.  If you try to limit the footprint you end up spending on more labor from having to run more shifts to get your throughput.

Lower Labor:   You want to have a lower headcount.  This is the focus on your more advanced DC’s.  Technology takes the place of an army of people on forklifts.  Product-to-person picking is an option here.

Effect on Capital:  There is a bigger expenditure of capital in the beginning.  However, there are immediate returns in accuracy and labor savings though.

Effect on Space:  With advanced technology there is usually a smaller footprint.  This means that you can buy more desirable land closer to your outlets or the transportation trunk.

Less Space:  You want to use the least space.  The easiest way to do this is to just run more shifts in your smaller DC.  You can run into problems though if you require a lot of storage.

Effect on Labor:  This can go two ways.  If you have less technology you will need a lot of labor in your smaller footprint.  Technology can use the air above the floor much more effectively, so you can have less labor.

Effect on Capital:  This is the same as the effect on Labor for the smaller footprint.  If you want to save on capital and have a small footprint you will have a lot of labor (shifts).  If you go the other way and want more storage and a smaller footprint you will have to invest more capital.

The trick is getting the balance right for the ROI you are trying to achieve.

So what does all this mean when you are choosing a supply chain partner?  Most engineering firms use the one-size-fits-all philosophy – they try to manage the whole warehouse with a single type of technology (pick-to-light or pick-to-voice).

And unfortunately that technology will dictate what your capital, labor and space will be.  One size does not fit all.

Different technologies have a different impact on ROI depending on where you are on the Pareto curve. It doesn’t matter if you are picking a pill or a pallet, economics of automation change as you move to the right on the Pareto curve.

Be sure that you pick a partner that can design the right technology for each bandwidth of your individual curve. Just like people, no two operations are alike; they are as distinctive as your fingerprints.

This will ensure that your decision of how you allocate your footprint, labor and capital.

Want to know more about how to help you “tame the curve”?  Download our White Paper on New Trends in Distribution.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...
Filed Under: Distribution Principles, Return on Investment ROI

Subscribe to Our Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Copyright abco AUTOMATION 2023

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2025 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

%d